Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and lecture both talk about a sound which it sometimes heard in the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean called "quackers". The reading get three theories about what is the sound; however, the professor stats that all of them cannot be possible.
At first, they discuss about orca whales. The author claims that quackers were the sound of orca whales. The speaker, on the other hand, says that it was not true because of two reasons. First, orca whales live in deep water; but the strange noises heard in surface of water. Second, the Russian's submarines can detected it by their sonar.
Secondly, the reading and the lecture talk about giant squid. The reading argues that the sounds were caused by giant squid which difficult to detect by sonar. In contrast, the professor states that giant squid always lived in the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean but it heard only between 1960s and 1980s.
Finally, the reading suggests that it can make by a military technology. Nevertheless, the lecturer says it cannot was possible because the sounds moved and changed the direction very quickly and there is not any technology that can transport as fast as it did.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | dentista1985 | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jiyakavya | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | dentista1985 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | jiyakavya | 3 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | jiyakavya | 3 | view |
- TPO-45 3
- tpo-44 70
- tpo-31- Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 60
- tpo-42-Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- tpo43Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.-Wait until the class or meetin 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading and lecture both talk about ...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that all of them cannot be possible. At first, they discuss about orca whales...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arines can detected it by their sonar. Secondly, the reading and the lecture ta...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t heard only between 1960s and 1980s. Finally, the reading suggests that it ca...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 1373.03311258 72% => OK
No of words: 199.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93467336683 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50260337669 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 145.348785872 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562814070352 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 419.366225166 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.616219461 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.8333333333 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5833333333 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0525384755148 0.272083759551 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0215709706556 0.0996497079465 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0228816423363 0.0662205650399 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0320799696034 0.162205337803 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0156978125838 0.0443174109184 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 53.8541721854 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.