Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline for several reasons.
First, the increased use of ethanol fuel would not help tosolve one of the biggest environmental problems caused by gasoline use: global warming. Like gasoline, ethanol releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere when it is burned for fuel and carbon dioxide is greenhouse gas: it helps trap heat in the atmosphere. Thus, ethanol offers no environmental advantage over gasoline.
Second, the production of significant amounts of ethanol would dramatically reduce the amount of plants available for uses other fuel. For example, much of the corn now grown in the United States is used to feed farm animals such as cows and chickens. It is estimated that if ethanol were used to satisfy just 10 percent of the fuel needs in the United States, more than 60 percent of the corn currently grown in the united stated would have to be used to produce ethanol. If most of the corn were used to produce ethanol, a substantial source of food for animals would disappear.
Third, ethanol fuel will never be able to compete with gasoline on price. Although the prices of ethanol and gasoline for the consumer are currently about the same, this is only because of the help in the form of tax subsidies given to ethanol producers by the United States government. These tax subsidies have cost the United States government over $11 billion in the past 30 years. If the United States government were to stop helping producers in this way, the price of ethanol would increase greatly.
The reading passage proposes three reasons why ethanol cannot be treated as a ideal substitute for gasoline. The profess, however thinks the reasons are not convincing. He justifies his conclusion with another three cogent arguments.
First of all, even though the reading passage maintains that the effect of global warming will continue because of released carbon dioxide by burning ethanol, the lecture argues that source of making ethanol is corn, the growing process of which is going to counteract global warming by absorbing greenhouse gas in the air.
Moreover, contrary to the statements in the brief reading that food supply for cattle will decrease as a result of taking a large amount of plant for ethanol, the professor' talk contends that raw materials for ethanol are some kinds of plants, which grow along side the walls, and these plants cannot be eaten by livestock.
Finally, although the author asserts that high price of ethanol may well lose competitiveness with gas without subsidiary from the U.S government, the professor just hold the opposite opinion that when production of ethanol get promoted the price is bound to get lower. He also estimate that price of new fuel will reduce 40 percent along with production amount becomes 3 times in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-18 | bayes11usmany | 71 | view |
| 2018-01-10 | Mario643 | 80 | view |
- Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him into an international celebrity. 3
- Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline for several reasons. First, t 90
- You will need to accomplish an assignment to do a presentation Which will you choose 1 Act out a scene from a play with a partner 2 Explain your review of a novel you recently you read 3 Read a selection of poem 60
- teachers should be paid as much as doctors lawyers or businessmen 95
- Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline for several reasons. First, t 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...easons why ethanol cannot be treated as a ideal substitute for gasoline. The prof...
^
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ted as a ideal substitute for gasoline. The profess, however thinks the reasons are not con...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: ALONG_SIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'alongside'?
Suggestion: alongside
...ol are some kinds of plants, which grow along side the walls, and these plants cannot be e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
... with gas without subsidiary from the U.S government, the professor just hold the...
^
Line 7, column 279, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'estimates'.
Suggestion: estimates
...he price is bound to get lower. He also estimate that price of new fuel will reduce 40 p...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 209.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16746411483 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51777409112 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 110.489079708 49.2860985944 224% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 154.285714286 110.228320801 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8571428571 21.698381199 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1428571429 7.06452816374 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186132032738 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678488636545 0.0996497079465 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618263702103 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103595198376 0.162205337803 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482509685221 0.0443174109184 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.3589403974 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.8541721854 78% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.3 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.