the graph and table show info about water use worldwide and water consumption in 2 countries.
The charts illustrate how much of water was used for agriculture, industry and homes all over the world, and water consumption in Brazil and the Democratic Republic of Congo in 2000.
Overall, it is apparent that global water consumption was seen a significant growth over the period from 1900 to 2000, in which agriculture accounted for the highest proportion of water used. In addition, the amount of water consumed was much higher in Brazil than that in the Congo.
Looking at the detail, in 1900, around 500 km3 of water was used by the agriculture sector, while the figures for the industrial and domestic water consumption were only one-fifth of that amount. By 2000, there was a considerable climb in the water needs of the agriculture sector, reached a high of about 3000 km3. In terms of the industrial and domestic water used, the proportions slightly rose to approximately a half and one-sixth of that amount, respectively.
In the year 2000, Brazil had 176 million people compared with just 5.2 million population of the Congo. Due to having 26.5 times more irrigated land in Brazil than in the Congo, water consumption per person in Brazil, at 359 m3, was much higher than that in the Congo, at only 8 m3.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-08-23 | Huyen Trang | 73 | view |
| 2017-08-23 | Huyen Trang | 73 | view |
| 2017-08-23 | Huyen Trang | 73 | view |
| 2017-08-23 | Huyen Trang | 73 | view |
- the graph shows the oil production capacity in 6 countries between 1990 and 2010 47
- the graph show relative price changes for fresh fruit and vegetable, sugar and sweets, and carbonated drink between 1979 and 2009. 78
- the graph below gives info about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007. 73
- the graph below shows information about consumption of spreads from 1989 to 2007. summarise information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- what are the advantages and disadvantages for children of TV? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81904761905 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6998950177 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.983971065 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241644598513 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122251898342 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667248775389 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169019427907 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633634105416 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.