the charts show the number of marriages and divorces in the USA, 1970-2000 and Marital status of adults Americans, 1970 and 2000.
The first bar chart illustrates how many Americans were married and divorced over a 30-year period from 1970 and 2000 while the second bar chart shows figures for the marital status of adult Americans in 1970 and 2000.
Overall, it is obvious that there was an upward trend in the number of marriages between 1970 to 2000. Most of adult Americans were married in both years, but the level of single adults was higher in 2000.
Looking at the detail, 2.5 million Americans were married in 1970. Having remained stable in 1980, the number of marriages fell slightly, reaching around 2.3 million in 1990, and followed by a marginal decline to 2 million in 2000. In contrast, the level of divorces reached a peak at nearly 1.5 million in 1980, Then the figure can be seen a fall to 1 million as the same as that in the first year in 2000.
Approximately 70% of adult Americans were married in 1970, then fell by around one-tenth of that number. Regarding unmarried and divorced status, the proportions rose by nearly 10% in 2000. There was a lower number of windowed Americans in 2000 compared to that in 1970.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-31 | bechir sekrafi | 78 | view |
| 2017-08-26 | Huyen Trang | 73 | view |
| 2017-08-26 | Huyen Trang | 73 | view |
| 2017-08-26 | Huyen Trang | 73 | view |
| 2017-08-26 | Huyen Trang | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the level of participation in education and science in developing countries and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990. 73
- the average annual expenditure of college students from three countries. 67
- the graph shows the oil production capacity in 6 countries between 1990 and 2010. 67
- the graph shows UK acid rain emissions, from 4 different sectors between 1990 to 2007. 67
- the graph below gives info about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, look, regarding, second, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6345177665 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38982270148 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522842639594 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5981252496 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.444444444 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.448654062721 0.215688989381 208% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193918762748 0.103423049105 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994661999181 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297701069924 0.15604864568 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924728499543 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.