Earth, which at one time, could be described as a pristine ball of green and blue, is now a dull gray entity with only patches of its former beauty remaining. This is largely due to the colonization of man everywhere on the planet. Furthermore, many complications have occurred due to this rapid colonization and even more will problems will begin in the near future if nothing is done. All nations passing the law to preserve wilderness will not only see these complications reduce but also reap benefits in the long run.
The encroachment of man in nature's territory has resulted in many animals either going extinct or close to it. Taking away the remaining territories will only accelerate the extinction of other species. If this takes place, the future generation will be observing the skeletons of tigers and rhinos in museums instead of their natural environment. Furthermore, they will not be able to appreciate nature as there are no more wilderness areas, only concrete jungles. Who would want to live in a future like this?
While it is true that exploiting wilderness areas will lead to economic gain, these gains will be offset by the losses made during the long-term. For example, global warming is becoming a real problem in recent times, leading to the melting of the polar ice caps which, in turn, is increasing the sea-level. For this reason, we are losing the land along our shores. Moreover, Cutting down trees in wilderness areas will only serve to accelerate this. As the temperature rises globally, several people will resort to using air-conditioners and fans, thereby creating the need for more energy which ultimately results in the loss of resources for the country.
Therefore, while passing laws to preserve nature may result in not reaping the economic gains in the short-term, they will lead to a prevention of losses in the long-run.
The past two decades have seen rapid industrialization, leading to rapid advances in technology. However, it has lead to many animals going extinct; many rivers being polluted. Even the air we breathe is not as fresh as it used to be. To prevent these situations from further deteriorating, nations need to pass laws to preserve nature.
- Claim It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Reason The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished 87
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 58
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.Write a response in which you di 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 57
- Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero. Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished. 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing the land along our shores. Moreover, Cutting down trees in wilderness areas w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 369.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0027100271 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81620456373 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3879618726 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1578947368 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4210526316 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.10526315789 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214131866896 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630939011586 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471075484539 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117727107738 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403169262735 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.