1. Some people say that the government should not put money on building theatres and sports stadiums. Other argues that they should spend more money on medical care and education. Discuss both view
In today’s competitive world, how the governments use the national budget has triggered a burgeoning population of concern worldwide. In this regard, whether the authorities should invest on constructing theatres and sports stadiums or medical care and education is a highly debated issue. This essay would discuss both points of view before coming to the reasonable conclusion.
On the one hand, it is irrefutable that health care and schooling are the backbones of a nation. Therefore, they play a crucial role in the growth of every country. Firstly, an innovated medical and education system could improve the inhabitants’ health and knowledge so that the productivity of their work would be improved as well. This, of course, is the key in order to boost a nation’s economy. Furthermore, an enormous investment on education and medical check-up could narrow the gap between the have and the havenot. As a result, a civilized society would be formed, decreasing the crime rate, joblessness and homelessness. Not to mention that they are the basic needs of the citizens so that it is the government duty to satisfied individuals’ demand.
Having said that, creating buildings for entertaining purposes could bring fame and a huge amount of profit to a country. Particularly, the host nations would gain them through activities which take place in these constructions and they could long enjoy the super-changed economic growth as a natural sequel. This could be evident from the World Cup, which had recently took place in South Africa in 2014, turning South Africa into the spotlight of every sport news when it occurred. Hence, it would improve the economy situation at that time in South Africa through the income from World Cup.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the government should make a balance between both sides which I have mentioned. By doing so, a nation could be roundly and fully developed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-08-29 | tmlong2000 | 89 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
... from the World Cup, which had recently took place in South Africa in 2014, turning ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, of course, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22115384615 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99843640767 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602564102564 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7213778082 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.8125 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126338236959 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405930666002 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464131592573 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0879838821422 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542051683929 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.