Heroes have been made of men and women since ancient Egypt or Greece, if not even earlier. They are the symbols which we strive to emulate. We admire and hail Noah for his belief and diligence, Einstein for his wits, Galileo for his discoveries etc. Through the ages, several people have been hailed as heroes and their deeds have been engraved into the history of mankind. No matter the age, even today, people will continue and look up to the individuals they admire as heroes. Unless these people who are hailed as heroes have done something grave that erases everything redeemable they have done up until now, the media cannot make their status as heroes vanish.
The statement portrays media to be an entity which scrutinizes the people we hail as heroes. Granted, that most media outlets tend to like juicy stories which slander people as these will attract more attention. However, media also helps in spreading their good deeds or respectable actions. Without the media, we would neither know who Elon Musk is and his amazing contributions in the field of clean energy and automated driving nor would we know of the contributions of BIll Gates in helping the world get rid of pernicious diseases such as polio or malaria. Reading such articles not only spreads the word of their actions but also inspires many people to work more diligently in order to achieve something great.
Even if the media scrutinizes someone for their actions, it does not mean their reputation has diminished. Consider Steve Jobs, for example, he faced a lot of scrutiny from the media regarding the birth of his daughter and his exit from Apple. Yet after he passed away, he was hailed a hero by many. However, if the actions of those individual were grave enough, then their reputations will diminish. For instance, Pablo Escobar was hailed a hero by the Venezuelans; he was even running in the elections to lead the country. However, once it was revealed that he was dealing in drugs, he faced great scrutiny from the press and his reputation was tarnished.
To summarize, no matter what age we live in, people will be hailed as heroes. The media serves to both glorify these individuals for their noble actions and scrutinize them for their ignoble ones. For an individual to be hailed as a hero, his noble actions should far outweigh his ignoble ones.
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppor 50
- Claim It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Reason The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished 87
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 58
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 16
- The following is a letter from the parent of a private school student to the principal of that school:Last year, Kensington Academy turned over management of its cafeteria to a private vendor, Swift Nutrition. This company serves low-fat, low-calorie meal 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, regarding, so, then, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 403.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83126550868 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41588986462 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528535980149 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8859253934 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.35 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.15 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178294301071 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580582220127 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348019990427 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112391265479 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306297023982 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.