tpo integrated 23
Both the lecture and the reading discuss the decline of the yellow cedar trees. The reading enumerates three hypotheses to illustrate why the decline happened. However, the lecture disagrees. It claims that each of the reading hypotheses are not convening and in adequate to prove the reason of the decline.
First of all, the reading states that insect’s parasites are the first reason for decrease in the population of the yellow cedar. The larvas of the beetles eat the wood of the trees caused damage to the trees. But, the lecture opposes this point saying that the healthy yellow cedar trees are not vulnerable to these kinds of parasites. Only the week, damage trees are easily attacked by the parasites. According to the professor the healthy yellow cedar contain chemicals that are poisons to insects.
Second the reading states that the brown bear is another cause of the decline. The bears claw the trees to eat the bark as it contains high amount of sugar, which weaken the tree and lead to kill the trees. However, the lecture refutes. It claims that the bears are not the main responsible cause for the overall decline. Some places like the island has no bears, and still has decline in the yellow cedar trees.
Lastly, the reading argues that the change in the climate cause decline in the tress populations. The roots of the trees start to grow in the winter rather than growing in the spring. Which lead to frost damage of the roots and consequently kill the trees. Yet, the lecture disagrees. it claims that frost damage is not the real cause of the decline. Furthermore, in lower elevation in which the weather is warm there are a lot of trees damage. On the other hand in higher elevation there is no damage. The roots of the trees are more sensitive to the change.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-15 | Salu | 70 | view |
| 2020-06-08 | maya14 | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | lucasantunes | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | fateme ozggoli | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-05 | ilda | 85 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 12, column 286, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... the trees. Yet, the lecture disagrees. it claims that frost damage is not the rea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, lastly, second, so, still, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 313.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78913738019 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33607724345 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.428115015974 0.540411800872 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 456.3 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 13.0662251656 168% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2515451312 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.1363636364 110.228320801 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2272727273 21.698381199 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 4.45695364238 269% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391303138395 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10752404714 0.0996497079465 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754592391643 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233070640029 0.162205337803 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811043542261 0.0443174109184 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.3589403974 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.91 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.42419426049 83% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.