The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarize the following information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts compare the proportion of different age groups in two distinct countries namely Yemen and Italy in the year 2000 and 2050.
Generally speaking, the population of children increases; however, the population of old people reduces in both region.
The proportion of below 59-year-olds declined in the Yemen; on the contrary, over-60-years has had an upsurge in that region, from about 3.6 % to just under 5.7 %. And more than a half of the Italy will be young people in the year 2025.
Having considered the population of Italy, you can deduce that in the year 2000, a half of the population was 15-59 years. Afterwards, it declined by about 17 %. In addition, 0-14 years has a reduction in the second considered period, by approximately 3 %. However, 60-year-old population has a two fold growth.
In brief, both Yemen and Italy has a rise in over-15-year-olds and they has, on the other hand, a reduction in below 15 years.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2013-05-20 | hamidrezat | 60 | view |
- universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. 63
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishm 77
- Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 55
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 55
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in millions) of telephone calls in Finland, divided into three categories, from 1995 – 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 40
flaws:
No. of Words: 159 200
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 159 200
No. of Characters: 739 1000
No. of Different Words: 90 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.551 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.648 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.77 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 45 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 33 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 28 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 21 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.896 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.556 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.429 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.725 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.112 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4