It has become debatable whether for society being to judge the prisoner who made crimes should be prize with felony or not to do. Majority claim that society should feel guiltily to accept a resolution to violator for assessing a death penalty. Albeit, other individuals disagree with this statement and suspect that there is no need to have death sentences whereas it can be solved with making incarcerate whole life in.
It has become for most people in many countries not to imprison if their locals do not obey after doing criminals repeatedly. They know their lightening culprits in the society would be pattern for guiltiness to others, and also they are aware of the fact that prisoners may unknowingly do some murderers during affect condition. However it does not mean people will suffer death pain as they have done to. It is characteristics of human beings to be understanding and forgiving.
There is one justification that judgement may adjudicate guiltes with proper penalty which could be homicide. For example, in certain countries it is considered the way to have border between crime and without criminals. It may also be very eccentric way for linearing to down or more specifically the declining the number of infraction. In these countries indication witnessed as it is expected.
Furthermore, adapting to the capital punishment can dodge to accuse while uplifting the honor to rules. Wearing the brand of name murderer in prison entire life which can be revolved any kind of pains or heavy loads in shoulders with correct resolution. This is the best way to maintain locals’ maximum security until their future.
To recapitulate, there are many aspects to this question and the authorof the essay feels that the easy punishment may increase the number of burden criminals if society does not use capital punishmants as on time.
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in the world and in different continents Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 91
- the charts below show the percentage of food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurant and sitdown restaurant 95
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Convenience food will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation. To what degree do you agree or disagree? 84
- IELTS Academic Writing Task 1/ Graph Writing - Bar Graph:» You are advised to spend about 20 minutes on this task.The graph compares the percentage of international and the percentage of UK students gaining second class degrees or better at a major UK Un 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'claims'.
Suggestion: claims
...rize with felony or not to do. Majority claim that society should feel guiltily to ac...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 330, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...some murderers during affect condition. However it does not mean people will suffer dea...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 448, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...t is characteristics of human beings to be understanding and forgiving. There is one justificat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...ning the number of infraction. In these countries indication witnessed as it is expected....
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, so, whereas, while, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08169934641 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79253481139 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601307189542 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5807133187 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13333333333 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280445225299 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764931311659 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556210019929 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136520695326 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630241590554 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.