19.09.2017
Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some aver that universities ought to accept as many men as women in every subject. Although, this proposal seems to be appealing at the first glance, I disagree with this prospect and below the reasons on which my stance based will be discussed in details.
On the one hand, implementation of the policy seems to have many advantages. Firstly, it is aimed to fight inequality between genders. In fact, statistically some subjects are more preferred by males than females and many assume that it is the result of biased attitude of university administration toward students. If the proposal is fulfilled, personal preferences and prejudices of educators will not impact the decision about accepting or dismissing a future student. Secondly, if the proposal is passed, this fact will undoubtedly encourage, for instance, young women to try to enroll in subjects and courses that are traditionally deemed as men’s ones. In other words, at least theoretically, the discussed act could positively affect situation with inequality in tertiary institutions.
On the other hand, there are some disadvantages as well. Primarily, this idea could be perceived as unfair by some individuals because academic performance of enrolling students is partly neglected. Likelihood exists that, for instance, instead of a man who has an average 3.9 a young woman with average 3.3 may be accepted in a course because all seats devoted to males have been already taken. Furthermore, this situation would likely lead to difficulties in education process due to listeners who were chosen with respect to their gender would probably have a different level of preparation and background knowledge. Thus, mechanical imposing of quotes could undermine public belief in fairness of the policy and even have a converse influence on listeners’ studying.
To sum up, the idea of imposing quotes promises to bring desirable alterations but its fulfillment in its current reading will cause increasing discontent among students as well as other drawbacks. Thus, it is safe to claim that shortages outweigh plausible benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-13 | BIBHU KALITA | 78 | view |
| 2017-09-19 | EugeneDubinchuk | 90 | view |
- TPO-25 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 85
- People nowadays live longer than they used to. What caused this situation? Is it a negative or positive development? 78
- TPO-27 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would bemore satisfying.Use specific reasons and exam 98
- Some people think that sport teaches children how to compete while others believe that children learn team work Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Essay topics: TPO-16 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
Comments
Essay evaluation report
for instance, young women to try to enroll in subjects and courses that are traditionally deemed as men’s ones
for instance, young women will try to enroll in subjects and courses that are traditionally deemed as men’s ones
the discussed act could positively affect situation with inequality in tertiary institutions.
the discussed act could positively affect situations with inequality in tertiary institutions.
the discussed act could positively affect a/the situation with inequality in tertiary institutions.
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 8.0 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 330 350
No. of Characters: 1723 1500
No. of Different Words: 206 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.262 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.221 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.929 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 129 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 103 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 83 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 54 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.748 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.8 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.289 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.505 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.042 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, at least, for instance, in fact, as well as, in other words, to sum up, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1783.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40303030303 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06103957326 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624242424242 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0714283656 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.866666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.089524871056 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0284870973077 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368009101105 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0538791739766 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269589513868 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.