The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend.
"Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams' revenue last year was twice as high as that of Fitch and included home sales that averaged $168,000, compared to Fitch's $144,000. Homes listed with Adams sell faster as well: ten years ago I listed my home with Fitch, and it took more than four months to sell; last year, when I sold another home, I listed it with Adams, and it took only one month. Thus, if you want to sell your home quickly and at a good price, you should use Adams Realty."
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
The homeowner asserts that Adams Realty (AR) is clearly better than Fitch Realthy (FR) this assertion is buttressed by several evidences which are connected with the conclusion by assumptions which should be carefully scrutinized in order to give a comprehensive estimation of the soundness of the friend's recommendation.
The first evidences which is given to us is that AR has more employees than FR. The originator of the argument surmises that number of the worker guarantee better service, this assumption is reasonable only in case all workers in both firms have the same level of expertise and experience, otherwise this author's belief is unwarranted. Perhaps estate agents of FR has a lot of more knowledge and expertise that make tham superior to their rivals. In other words, the assumption is not warranted and therefore it weakens the argument.
The second fact which is shared with us is that AR had bigger revenue than FR and the average home sale of AR was $168,000 when the average of FR was only $144,000. The statement assumes that situation of the previous year will be repeated in this one. However, we are not told any information which allows us to draw such an idea. Probably the real estate business in the town has a stiff competition with each other, and it is plausible that FR will dominate the field in this year. The argument might have been stronger had the writer given us more information about the dynamic and level of sales and revenue for ten previous years. However, even with such data, the probability exists that the situation in real estate business may change dramatically over a short period of time.
Finally, the argument uses unreasonable comparison of a situation which take place ten years ago and last year. The author believes that the situations were similar to each other but in fact, we have two homes which were located in different parts of the city, perhaps one of them is cheaper than other. Additionally to it, the economic situation last year may differ from one of ten years ago. For instance, the economy of the state might be in a deep stagnation ten years ago, the level of sales and consumption dropped drastically, in these circumstances the result of work of FR may display its high efficiency and professionalizm. Moreover, it is not conspicuous what result might have demonstrated AR in the same circumstances. In other words, the comparison of two situations which have nothing in common is unscrupulous. What is more, even if the two cases were similar to each other as well as all cirmustances, that is almost impossible, the extrapolation of one case on all situation is unreasonable. One case cannot and should not be used for drawing general conclusion.
In conclusion, the superiority of AR is questionable due to the fact that the homeowner does not manage to support his or her claim properly. The given data about average sales and revenue cannot support author's assumptions, moreover, the usage of one case to make a conclusion about the general situation is unreasonable as well.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-17 | sapana | 70 | view |
2020-01-16 | stevewang1007 | 79 | view |
2019-11-16 | siirsalvador | 75 | view |
2019-10-25 | aniketnichat | 63 | view |
2019-09-17 | suhas201227 | 83 | view |
- Claim: The surest indicator of a great nation must be the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.Reason: Great achievements by a nation's rulers, artists, or scientists will ensure a good life for the majority of that nation's people.Write a r 60
- Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall st 87
- The president of Grove College has recommended that the college abandon its century-old tradition of all-female education and begin admitting men. Pointing to other all-female colleges that experienced an increase in applications after adopting coeducatio 10
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 80
- Essay topics TPO 48 Integrated Writing Task 90
Sentence: Perhaps estate agents of FR has a lot of more knowledge and expertise that make tham superior to their rivals.
Error: tham Suggestion: than
Sentence: For instance, the economy of the state might be in a deep stagnation ten years ago, the level of sales and consumption dropped drastically, in these circumstances the result of work of FR may display its high efficiency and professionalizm.
Error: professionalizm Suggestion: professionalism
Sentence: What is more, even if the two cases were similar to each other as well as all cirmustances, that is almost impossible, the extrapolation of one case on all situation is unreasonable.
Error: cirmustances Suggestion: circumstances
----------------
argument 1 -- OK
argument 2 -- not OK. We may say: Adams may charge more service fee.
argument 3 -- OK
----------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 517 350
No. of Characters: 2493 1500
No. of Different Words: 233 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.768 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.822 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.805 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 158 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 128 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 93 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 70 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.619 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.121 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.3 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.499 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.104 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5