The chart gives information about European people of different age groups who went to the gym once a month or more between 1990 and 2010.
The given chart illustrates the proportion of young and old people in Europe, who exercised occasionally at the gym during the 20-year period, from 1990 to 2010.
In 1990, the ratio of men and women in the age group of 25-34 going to the gym was around 9%, claiming the first place of all age groups. Over the 20-year period, the figure rose significantly by 41% to peak at 50%. Coming in close second in 1990 at below 9%, the percentage of young people, aging 18-24, climbed up steadily in the first 8 years, meeting the ratio of 25-34 group at around 29% in 1998, then continued to surpass dramatically to reach the record high of 59% in 2010, despite a plunk to 50% in 2008.
While both starting at around 5% in the beginning, the 35-44 group's rate increased at a faster pace than 45 and over group to reach the number of 40% in 2010, higher by 19% compared to the rate of 45 and over group.
Overall, the percentage of people from all age groups going to the gym experienced a growth throughout the 20-year surveyed period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-09-21 | lethianhthu | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- The tables compare working hours of full time and part time workers in Greece Netherlands and the UK compared to European average in 2002 82
- News plays an important part in most people s lives and news media has become more influential in people s lives Why do you think this is the case Is it a positive or negative development 73
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving the existing public transport. Discuss bo 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45789473684 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40765745164 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542105263158 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.4140532059 43.030603864 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.166666667 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6666666667 22.9334400587 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200920109925 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106808528541 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617318008714 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132159616308 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392271937988 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.85 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.18 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.