The given chart illustrates the proportion of young and old people in Europe, who exercised occasionally at the gym during the 20-year period, from 1990 to 2010.
In 1990, the ratio of men and women in the age group of 25-34 going to the gym was around 9%, claiming the first place of all age groups. Over the 20-year period, the figure rose significantly by 41% to peak at 50%. Coming in close second in 1990 at below 9%, the percentage of young people, aging 18-24, climbed up steadily in the first 8 years, meeting the ratio of 25-34 group at around 29% in 1998. From then on, it continued to surpass the other 3 groups dramatically to reach the record high of 59% in 2010, despite a plunk to 50% in 2008.
While both starting at around 5% in the beginning, the 35-44 group's rate increased at a faster pace than 45 and over group to reach the number of 40% in 2010, higher by 19% compared to the rate of 45 and over group.
Overall, the percentage of people from all age groups going to the gym experienced a growth throughout the 20-year surveyed period.
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- The chart gives information about European people of different age groups who went to the gym once a month or more between 1990 and 2010 58
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors who came to the UK for different purposes between 1989 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagram shows how geothermal energy is used to produced electricity 72
- The chart below shows the amount of money given to developing countries from five organizations from 2008 to 2011 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42131979695 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39013536086 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543147208122 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.646309168 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.428571429 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1428571429 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203942048838 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991120286974 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597883958407 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134558576516 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389608444929 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 76.9 61.2550243902 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.