The chart below compare the number of people per household* in the UK in 1981 and 2001.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart shows a comparison of the number of people in a household in the UK in the years 1981 and 2001.
Overall, a 2-person household remained the most popular among the people in the UK whereas not many people enjoyed sharing a home with more than 5 people in 1981 and 2001.
In 2981, around 31% of people in the UK reported sharing a house with another person, making this the most favorite choice. This percentage even rose further by 3% to 34% in 2001, maintaining its place in the top tier.
The rate of 3-person households in 1981 was seen at 20%, ranking in the second place. However in 2001, this number dropped to 17%. In comparison, while only 17% of people in the UK said that they preferred to live alone in 2981, this rate rose significantly by 9% to reach 26% in 2001.
The proportion of 4-person, 5-person and 6-person households in 1981 was recorded at 18%, 8% and 6% respectively. After 20 years, these choices remained unpopular as the numbers experienced a slight drop to 15%, 6% and 2%, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-25 | lethianhthu | 78 | view |
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 56
- The graph shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 to 2007. 67
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports center now and how it will look after redevelopement 73
- As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road systems Some people think the government should pay for this Others however think the drivers should cover the costs Discuss both views and give your opinion 90
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in 3 different countries. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 87, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...en at 20%, ranking in the second place. However in 2001, this number dropped to 17%. In...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, whereas, while, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62162162162 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6223738124 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2640830812 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271833093899 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126871178743 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110624195232 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187193641456 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119374239614 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.