The chart below compare the number of people per household* in the UK in 1981 and 2001.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart shows a comparison of the number of people in a household in the UK in the years 1981 and 2001.
Overall, a 2-person household remained the most popular among the people in the UK whereas not many people enjoyed sharing a home with more than 5 people in 1981 and 2001.
In 2981, around 31% of people in the UK reported sharing a house with another person, making this the most favorite choice. This percentage even rose further by 3% to 34% in 2001, maintaining its place in the top tier.
The rate of 3-person households in 1981 was seen at 20%, ranking in the second place. However in 2001, this number dropped to 17%. In comparison, while only 17% of people in the UK said that they preferred to live alone in 2981, this rate rose significantly by 9% to reach 26% in 2001.
The proportion of 4-person, 5-person and 6-person households in 1981 was recorded at 18%, 8% and 6% respectively. After 20 years, these choices remained unpopular as the numbers experienced a slight drop to 15%, 6% and 2%, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-25 | lethianhthu | 78 | view |
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 73
- The graph shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 to 2007. 67
- The charts show what Uk graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after college in 2008. 89
- When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- News plays an important part in most people s lives and news media has become more influential in people s lives Why do you think this is the case Is it a positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 87, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...en at 20%, ranking in the second place. However in 2001, this number dropped to 17%. In...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, whereas, while, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62162162162 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6223738124 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2640830812 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271833093899 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126871178743 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110624195232 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187193641456 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119374239614 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.