The table shows how many international students studies in Canada and the US by the country of origin.
The given table gives information on the number of international students from different countries choosing to study in the USA and Canada from 2002 to 2003.
Overall, more students chose the USA as their academic destination compared to Canada from 2002 to 2003, whereas Canada held a faster growth rate during the same period.
In Canada from 2002 to 2003, there was a total increase of 17% of international students coming to study, from almost 60,000 to over 70,000. Among these students, Chinese took up the largest number of students with 5,400 students in 2002 and 7,800 students in 2003, making them the most rapid growth rate of 45%. On the other hand, while Indians showed to be the least abundant in the number of students in Canada, it is clear that more students who originated from India (35% increase) chose Canada to pursue their academic careers than those from the USA with only 9% more of students.
A different picture was seen in the USA during the same period. Even though the overall ratio change was extremely small at only 2%, the actual number of international students in the USA was much larger than that of Canada, at almost 600,000 students in 2003. While Canada was becoming more popular in Indian communities, it was proven that fewer Indian students were interested in the US as a place to study with a decrease of 9% to around 180,000 students in 2003. Chinese students were seen to be the most keen on studying abroad with a rise of 6% to almost 120,000 students in 2003, whereas only around 34,000 Canadian students chose the US as a place to expand their knowledge.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-12 | lethianhthu | 67 | view |
- The graph below gives information about the price of bananas in four countries between 1994 and 2004 67
- The given picture shows the process of making electricity from coal 80
- The diagram shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane 70
- The plans show a change to a small theater in 2010 and 2012 56
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 33.7804878049 181% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 965.302439024 138% => OK
No of words: 280.0 196.424390244 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40979082842 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457142857143 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 389.7 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.297761589 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.777777778 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1111111111 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280302459114 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129565641585 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674173502125 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188417364888 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581019220094 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.