The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
The given charts provide information on the ratios of sodium, saturated fat and sugar eaten by the Americans, all of which could cause serious health issues if consumed too much. Overall, there is a difference in the percentage of three types of nutrients eaten in daily meals in the USA.
In the case of sodium, the largest amount people in the USA consume on a daily basis is during dinner, which tops at 43%. At lunches, only around half of that number of people consume sodium, at around 29%; whereas not a lot of people choose to add sodium in their breakfasts and snacks.
A similar situation occurs in the case of saturated fat, which is also got eaten the most at dinner. However, there is a slight difference as more people in the US tend to choose products containing saturated fat as snacks with a rate of 21%. Breakfast is still the meal with the least amount of consumed saturated fat.
However, when it comes to sugar, there is a totally contrasting picture. 42% of Americans is reported to eat products with added sugar as snacks. The remaining 58% is distributed somewhat evenly between breakfast, lunch and dinner with the ratios of 16%, 19% and 23% respectively.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-08-08 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 11 | view |
2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
2024-01-04 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
2023-12-06 | Tosyne | 67 | view |
- The charts show the percentage of water used for different purposes in 6 areas of the world. 73
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a frog. 73
- In many countries today if people want to find work they have to move away from their friends and their families Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The plans show a school library 5 years ago and the same library now 68
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72115384615 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53479849344 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572115384615 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0410876639 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141914925374 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623777970978 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948865805632 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101004910904 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13671565846 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.