The graph shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 to 2007.
The given graph illustrates how much carbon dioxide in average each person emit in the UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal throughout the 40-year period from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, in the UK and Sweden, the average amount of CO2 went on a downward trend, whereas the number in Italy and Portugal experienced an increase in 40 years of surveying.
Throughout the first 10 years, from 1967 to 1977, the amount of CO2 emissions in Sweden went up smoothly, from above 8 to over 10 tonnes, while the figure in the UK decreased inconsiderably. However, from then on, the amount of emitted CO2 tended to decline in both countries. In the UK, from 1977 to 2007, the volume of CO2 emissions went down gradually, from over 10 to around 9 tonnes. Meanwhile, in Sweden, there was a sharp reduction from over 10 to around 7 tonnes in 1987, and then a continual decline to below 6 tonnes at the end of the surveyed period.
In Italy and Portugal, there was a similar pattern in the changes of the amount of CO2 emissions. From 1967 to 1997, the volume of CO2 each person emitted in Portugal increased stably, from around 1 to 5 tonnes, while the figure in Italy experienced a steep growth in the first 10 years then a gradual growth from 4 to below 8 tonnes. In the last 10 years, the number remained the same in Italy, whereas the change in Portugal was inconsiderable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-07 | Rajan khehra | 73 | view |
| 2017-09-16 | lethianhthu | 67 | view |
- Write about the following topic Televised talent shows have become popular in many societies today Are these shows a good method of finding talented people or are they just entertainment Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from 86
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 73
- The given picture shows the process of making electricity from coal 80
- The chart below compare the number of people per household in the UK in 1981 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people believe that it a good idea that older people continue to work if it is possible for them to do Do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 33.7804878049 192% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1117.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55918367347 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6008040278 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448979591837 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 3.36585365854 386% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.5301074174 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.111111111 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2222222222 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237048897726 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113083827135 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094147921028 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187534453107 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.097871208829 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.