The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given data illustrates the information about telephone calls in the UK over 7 years period from 1995 to 2002. While mobile and national and international calls had been increased during the period, the calls via local fixed line had been swelled up which is then followed by decline to the same number of minutes in 2002 as it was in 1995.
In 1995, calls via mobile phones were taking a rather negligible share of the telephone calls. Mobile phone calls were roughly 2 billions minutes in 1995. This number had been gradually climbed to just a shy of 10 billions in 1998 and following this increase, the total number of mobile phone calls had significantly increased to 45 billions of minutes in year of 2002. Similarly, we can see a steady climb in the amount of calls via national and international line. It had started at approximately 38 billions of minutes in 1995 and steadily swelled up to 62 billions of minutes in 2002. However, calls in local lines differs in figures. In 1995, it had started at 70 billions, which is followed by the number that peaked at 90 billions in 1999. After the reaching to highest point, the calls via local lines had decreased to 70 billions in 2002 as it was the same level in 1995.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-13 | mary.ssherr | 84 | view |
- Damage to the environment is an inevitable consequence of worldwide improvements in the standard of living 76
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 88
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- In recent years some countries have experienced very rapid economic development. this has resulted in much higher standards of living in urban areas but not in the countryside.This situation may bring some problems for the country as a whole.What are thes 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 330, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '45 billion'.
Suggestion: 45 billion
...ne calls had significantly increased to 45 billions of minutes in year of 2002. Similarly, we ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 499, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '38 billion'.
Suggestion: 38 billion
...l line. It had started at approximately 38 billions of minutes in 1995 and steadily swelled up...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 557, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '62 billion'.
Suggestion: 62 billion
...utes in 1995 and steadily swelled up to 62 billions of minutes in 2002. However, calls in loca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 766, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the highest'.
Suggestion: to the highest
...90 billions in 1999. After the reaching to highest point, the calls via local lines had de...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, similarly, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58636363636 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55483256232 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477272727273 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7642358506 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.9 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241379235722 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116192420749 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057355761985 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207278849997 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00652311902837 0.0819641961636 8% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.