Tpo 44
The reading and the listening passage have conflicting opinions about whether the coin in Maine in the United States is fake or not. The author of the reading believes that the coin was placed at the site recently by someone. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article and brings up three reasons to reject the specific point in the reading passage. She thinks the coin is not fake.
The first point the author makes is that the place where the coin where found is very far from the place of Norse settlements. It is mentioned that this long distance makes it's impossible to be a real connection between the settlements and the coin. The lecturer opposes this by explaining that many other objects come from great distances. Furthermore, the coin could reach the site through Norse travel.
Secondly, the author contends that no other coins have been found at that especial place, therefore the article notes that the Norse did not bring any silver coins with them to the Norse. The concept is refused by the lecturer, she says the Norse settlement was not their permanent settlement. She elaborates that they pack their valuable things and when they returned, they take it back.
Finally, the author states that the silver coins might be useless to them because native North American did not consider silver coins as money. The lecturer rebuts this argument and states that silver coins might be very appealing and beautiful for them. She put forward the idea that they may use it as neckless and other jewelry. so because it is interesting for them it can be used in trade.
In the conclusion, the lecture and the author appear to be in disagreement about whether the coin is a genuine piece of historical evidence. the author contends that it is a historical fake which is contradicted by the lecturer.
- TPO28 3
- TPO 49Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons 80
- TPO 40Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO43Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related 73
- TPO 45Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and exampl 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...placed at the site recently by someone. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Line 7, column 333, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...y use it as neckless and other jewelry. so because it is interesting for them it c...
^^
Line 8, column 141, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...a genuine piece of historical evidence. the author contends that it is a historical...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 316.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81012658228 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4187733811 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503164556962 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 460.8 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4263488801 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4117647059 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5882352941 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35294117647 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.494808616661 0.272083759551 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152100466512 0.0996497079465 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111304330932 0.0662205650399 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253303334653 0.162205337803 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700235576506 0.0443174109184 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.