The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given data illustrates information about average carbon dioxide emissions per person in 4 different countries over 40 years from 1967 to 2007. It is evident from the graph that emissions in United Kingdom and Sweden fell down while the increase in emissions was experienced in Italy and Portugal.
The carbon dioxide emissions in UK steadily shrunk from roughly 11 to 8.5 metric tonnes during 40 years. Therefore, the figure in Sweden is slightly different from UK. Emissions in Sweden had rised from 8.5 tonnes and piked at 10.3 tonnes in 1977. Following this, the trend starts to decrease drastically to 6.5 in 1987 which is then gradually slid to 5.5 metric tonnes in 2007.
In contrast, CO2 emissions in Italy significantly climbed from 4.3 to 6.5 metric tonnes in 1977 which is continued to modestly swell up to 7.5 in 1997. The carbon emission in Italy remained stable over 10 years from 1997 to 2007. Similarly, in Portugal rate of emission grow up from 1 to 4.5 metric tonnes in 1997 and went almost unchanged for next 10 years.
To sum up, the air contamination in UK and Sweden reduced while this case is just reverse for Italy and Portugal.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-12-17 | sherin rijo | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | anhminhbnvn1 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | Sai sushma | 67 | view |
| 2018-07-19 | Sha | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | anhminhbnvn1 | 73 | view |
- Many young people leaving school think that going to university will give them higher wages, superior career prospects and greater job satisfaction. However, they would do better to get a job and start earning as soon as possible. 70
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- a formal letter to local council on the subject that your local swimming pool is to be replaced by a new sports center. 33
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 88
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of people in Great Britain living alone by age and sex in 2004 and 2005 54
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, then, therefore, well, while, in contrast, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7960199005 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55392087172 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55223880597 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2475599047 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212548904451 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943933669609 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717075052955 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140413219443 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104523542016 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.