Nowadays, having a plan in each person's career is very important in life. Having a weekly and monthly plan can help anyone to deal with complexity. The important question regarding this is that if young people should organize their life time or not. From my point of view, I deeply believe that having a plan for every time on life can solve whatever problem that we may counter. In the following I will address the most discernible reasons.
First, Todays world is more competitive that past. Even though more job opportunity has been provided but every distinct company want to choose the best person. This make employment more complex and any succession needs plan. For example, two years ago I was preparing for an entry exam in civil structure. Since I had heard that company's entry exam is comprehensive, I decided to make daily, weekly and monthly plan. After two month I could end all the materials and took the exam. The results were brilliant and I took the first place in exam in which every one after exam wants to take one leaf out of my book. That experience taught me that planning and organizing can help a person to deal with hard and complex problems.
In addition, time table make a person more regular that results in feast appetite to solve complex problem. Accordingly, more interest in solving tough question is an attribute of regular people and this will not be achieve just though planning. For instance, six months ago I faced a riddle in my thesis procedure. I knew that one-week plan is not suitable for such a tough question and tried to be regular in time. If I want to solve riddle own my own it was like to make brick without straw. Therefore, I planned to talk to an expert at least 1 hour a day. Consequently, after 6 weeks I solved that problem by relying on good planning and regular time management.
To sum up, As the aforementioned examples have illustrated planning and organizing in people career can bring them opportunity to solve arduous problems. Not only high competition provokes this point, but also regularity help them to overcome with problem of new world.
- "Because of television and worldwide computer connections, people can now become familiar with a great many places that they have never visited. As a result, tourism will soon become obsolete." 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 83
- TPO 48- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 43 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...t if young people should organize their life time or not. From my point of view, I deeply...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'month' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'months'.
Suggestion: months
...ily, weekly and monthly plan. After two month I could end all the materials and took ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 418, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...estion and tried to be regular in time. If I want to solve riddle own my own it wa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, at least, for example, for instance, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72972972973 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58209828548 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554054054054 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9613073862 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.5454545455 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8181818182 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31818181818 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145915492734 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466238666467 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400786850809 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100462361374 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539704887967 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.