problems with sending human to Mars
The author enumerates some possible problems associated with sending human to Mars to indicate that it is much more arduous than moving to Moon. The lecturer, however, refutes the proposed claim by mentioning some counterclaims, she firmly believes that there are some proposed solutions for these challenges.
First, the reading asserts that a round-trip to Mars takes much more the trip to Moon, at least two years. As a result, a crew requires a lot of supplies such as food, water, oxygen each of which is cumbersome to carry to the Mars. Conversely, the speaker concedes the point mentioned in the reading, but she argues that by hydropanics human being is able to have access to all of these. In fact, they can grow plant in water which not only needs less space but also provides crew with fresh water. In addition, plants release oxygen utilized as fresh air for crews.
Second, according to the passage, the astronauts experience a long-run zero-gravity environment which may causes several medical problems like lowering bone density. On the contrary, the professor points out some previous lunches in the pasts. She thinks that crews have learned numerous ways by which they will be able to solve this problem. For instance, a regular exercise is really beneficial for preventing such impacts on human body. Moreover, consuming calcium and some other minerals can be effective for this matter.
Third, based on the author's assertion, astronauts are exposed to hazardous levels of sun radiation inflicting some problematic issues for them, and protective equipment cannot carried there, on the grounds that they augment the weight of spaceship. Nevertheless, the lecturer opposes the statement, and she mentions that some other aspects of this issue should be considered. She adds that some, not all of these radiations, are harmful to human body. Furthermore, there are some light-weight tools which can be used as a shelter when the radiation, which is detected by a special equipment, is intense. In other words, in a majority portion of their mission they are not exposed to these radiation, and just in some time they can be protected by these shelters.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-09 | Beichen | 88 | view |
| 2023-03-30 | sara.ana | 80 | view |
| 2021-10-28 | Sara refaat | 68 | view |
| 2021-07-31 | talelaldabous | 73 | view |
| 2021-02-02 | Elhamsarvari | 60 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 21, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...for this matter. Third, based on the authors assertion, astronauts are exposed to ha...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 684, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this radiation' or 'these radiations'?
Suggestion: this radiation; these radiations
...f their mission they are not exposed to these radiation, and just in some time they can be prot...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 764, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hey can be protected by these shelters.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, furthermore, however, may, moreover, nevertheless, really, second, so, third, at least, for instance, in addition, in fact, such as, as a result, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1824.0 1373.03311258 133% => OK
No of words: 356.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12359550562 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69178520924 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 145.348785872 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587078651685 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 419.366225166 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1708698572 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.294117647 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9411764706 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1764705882 7.06452816374 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157437841376 0.272083759551 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503135216745 0.0996497079465 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967339263343 0.0662205650399 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111048438639 0.162205337803 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862216099352 0.0443174109184 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 63.6247240618 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.