Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage.
The lecturer disagrees with the statement in the reading material that humpback whales navigate by the stars and refutes the three main points with logic and scientific evidence.
To begin with, the lecture denies the connection between humpback whales being smart and their inclination to use stars as navigator. This is supported by the fact that some birds also navigate by stars yet they only have normal intelligence. Therefore, humpback whales' smart brains do not guarantee their use of stars.
Next the lecturer offers different explanation to the fact that humpback whales migrate in straight lines. He says it might be illustrated by that the animals actually utilize earth magnitude field to help them as external force. What's more, the fact that humpback whales have certain structure in their brains reinforces the lecturer's opinion.
Lastly, the connection between humpback whales' frequent floating up with their utilization of starts is also vulnerable in the lecturer's eyes because that other animals, such as sharks also look up with the purpose of hunting though. in addition, humpback whales most often float up in the daytime when there's no trace of starts, which further renders the opinion in the reading material as speculation.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-11 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
2019-12-11 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
2019-12-10 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
2019-12-10 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
2019-12-10 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and examples to supp 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and examples to supp 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the pastUse specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...e field to help them as external force. Whats more, the fact that humpback whales hav...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...tructure in their brains reinforces the lecturers opinion. Lastly, the connection betwee...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 234, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... up with the purpose of hunting though. in addition, humpback whales most often fl...
^^
Line 4, column 303, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...most often float up in the daytime when theres no trace of starts, which further rende...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, if, lastly, look, so, therefore, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1055.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 199.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30150753769 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56115819991 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592964824121 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9814776695 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.222222222 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06452816374 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0449859252113 0.272083759551 17% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.021280958128 0.0996497079465 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0207241353269 0.0662205650399 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0329662250406 0.162205337803 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175037022767 0.0443174109184 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.