Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions proposed in the reading passage.

Essay topics:

Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions proposed in the reading passage.

The passage and the lecture discuss the presented solutions for preventing the birds from crush with glasses. The reading expresses that there are three solutions for decreasing the amount of injuries of birds. Whereas, the lecturer disagrees with this methods due to having another problems for birds.
First, the passage declares that if company of glasses can make glasses with only one direction, they will be able to reduce the flying the brids through the windows. However, the professor in the lecture points out that this work is not useful because when you make a glass in one direction it is the cause glass become similar to mirror; therefore, birds think that these are sky and fly through them.
Moreover, the reading believes that the colorful glass can help to deceive birds; thus, they think that these are stripes and avoid from crushing. Nevertheless, the man in the lecture claims that if the birds think these dark things are holes they fly through, as well as, these types of glass is the cause of blacking home during days.
Finally, the passage mentions that make an artificial magnetic field in the glasses is the good factor that birds change their direction and this perform as a hinder, Although the lecture expresses that the birds use the Earth's magnetic fields for their long distance trips not short distance; hence, if they receive these signals form glasses, they will change direction to glasses.
Although the reading mentions three solutions for hinding birds from injuring of glasses, the lecturer refutes all of these ways with mentions evidence that reveal their insufficienties.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2017-10-25 9104054 56 view
Essays by user 9104054 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0861423221 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34829369977 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520599250936 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 390.6 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.0844170497 49.4020404114 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.888888889 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 20.7667163134 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7777777778 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0831662252888 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431993064997 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0254988037352 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0501761107468 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00899121403584 0.056905535591 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.