At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus such as how many hours the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria. But at some universities, experts are hired to make these decisions, and students are almost never involved. Which approach do you prefer and why?
Nowadays, some universities are attended to prepare a circumstance that students will be able to participate in the decisions about themselves, although other universities have opposite opinion about this matter and they would rather utilize experts for making decisions. I adamantly believe that it is better to give this situation to proficient people. that is because of they need to consider all aspects, as well as selecting fitted students that making decisions is hard, and the universities need experienced people for making a decision.
First and foremost, when you want to make a decision, you must consider all aspects of having better results. In other words, students maybe ignore some important subjects in their decision due to their benefits. For example, when I was a student at the university, there was a disagreement among students on when dining hall must be opened in morning. The students that they lived in the dormitory, they had believed that it is better the breakfast distributed in last night of every day, however, students that they live in their home had opposite opinion about this situation; therefore, existing experts for these situations is indispensable.
Finally, all of us know if you want to decrease the amount of insufficiency in works, you must make a correct decision about them. It does not occur unless the presence of experienced people for deciding. To put it differently, when there are skilled people in work, you can guarantee the consequents of the work. As an example, my brother started for doing a private company with his friends, however, they did not have any experience in this field. Their work was failed after several months due to lack of experience.
As outlined above, it is better to assign experts to solve the problems of universities. That is owing to they consider all aspects, moreover, selecting suitable students is difficult, and making decisions about universities are needed, experienced people.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO 41- task 1 76
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they change the specific arguments presented in the reading passage 3
- Use specific examples and evidences to support your answer.1- trust people for future life, 2- strat to other crimes, 3-1- make better life, 2- responsibility, 3-1- make a good connection, 2- people help him, 3- pleasure sense 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Children rely too much on the technology, like computers, smart phones, video games for fun and entertainment. Playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for children’s deve 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 356, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...ve this situation to proficient people. that is because of they need to consider all...
^^^^
Line 1, column 364, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_I[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'because they' instead.
Suggestion: because they
...situation to proficient people. that is because of they need to consider all aspects, as well a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 319.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19435736677 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88231516086 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526645768025 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.9983246821 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.357142857 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141258931818 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465322137882 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046045474792 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0913664298114 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416684038334 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.