Society has to provide a magnificent support for the development of the new generation since the future of the society depends on them. I agree with the recommendation that children who have special talents should receive intensive support and training at an early age to develop their talent.
Talent is the catalyst of the success, which cannot be achieved without continuous training and hard work. Society should recognize the talented children in their early stage and provide all the support and guidance for them to nurture their talents. In other words, talent is a gift of God, it comes in early age and demands an exceptional care to flourish. For instance, Lionel Messi, prominent soccer player, he started playing at an early age and developed outstanding performance, now he is one of the most talented and successful soccer players in the world. This phenomenal achievement would not exist without early training and hard working to develop his exceptional skills. Other examples could be found in many famous soccer clubs since they all have youth teams, enable to nurture the promising talents of some children who would be successful team players in the future.
Furthermore, the flourish of the talents can have immense effects on the society. Many societies are discerned by their figures and idols. For instance, Paris is known as the city of The art and fashion, which make the city a hub for people from different part of the world who would love to explore the magic of art. Thus, it is important for any society to promote the talents in early ages since the success of these talents can be beneficial for the society whom they belong to.
Despite the fact that training in early ages might be stressful and overwhelming for the children and their families, it is crucial for the development of their talent and for making them more resistant to the pressure of the life of the talents. Furthermore, many talents demand early training in order to be developed. Such as gymnastics, kids start practicing gymnastics as early as three years old, it more efficient and practical to start at early ages.
In addition, many talents were wasted because of the lack of support from their society. In many cases, children were persuaded by their parents to abandon their talents and focus on their academic achievement, because parents do not think talent will guarantee any success to their children. Mostly, families will encourage their children to presume their dreams if they found a proper support from the community.
In conclusion, talents require intensive support and guidance from the society to be successful. Society should not ignore the talent of the children specifically because supporting the talent development at early ages, society assures that the talented children receive all the infrastructures they needed in order to thrive.
- 12 Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition 68
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 33
- In order for any work of art—for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song—to have merit, it must be understandable to most people. 75
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sur 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 54
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, thus, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in many cases, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2410.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 472.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10593220339 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65138803604 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455508474576 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 738.0 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8449619169 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369685758134 0.243740707755 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128113271637 0.0831039109588 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937764905841 0.0758088955206 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227613530658 0.150359130593 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0969124418181 0.0667264976115 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.