Nowadays congestion and traffic jams are a common and major problem in most cities. Some people believe it is a good idea to construct wider roads to resolve this issue. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? What can be the solution, in your opinion?
Lifestyle in the cities has undergone dramatic changes over recent decades. Presently, the problem of traffic jams is spreading its roots in every nook and corner of the cities. Therefore, some people advocate that the establishment of extensive roads is a lucrative panacea to address this worrying issue. Here, i would like to discord with the given statement.
There are manifold points to endorse my view. First and foremost, nowadays, most of people travel by their personal cars and it leads to rise in the number of traffic jams. Therefore, It is a prime duty of government to discourage people towards the excessive usage of cars in order to restrain this burning issue. What is more, providing better facilities of public transport could be fruitful to take over traffic concerns. To demonstrate, the services of buses and trains should be frequent so that people can travel on time easily without any inconvenience. Adding to it, all it is imperative to make transport modes less crowded, neat and clean by taking proactive steps. Consequently, people will be encouraged towards using public vehicles and it will help to curb traffic congestion.
Furthermore, making flyovers is likely to reduce the problem of gridlocks at larger extent. To be specific, the presence of flyovers can restrict the number of cars in the city centre. Besides this, flyovers can prevent the entry of cars on busy roads. Hence, it is required to make flyovers to control traffic. Last but not least, a large number of trees will be cut down due to construction of wider roads. As a result, it will be detrimental for ecology. On the contrary, others have contrasting arguments.
They think that wider roads could assist to reduce the number of gridlocks. To justify, roads will not get flooded with a large number of vehicles if there is ample space to travel easily. What is more, the chances of accidents will decline on the roads. Hence, the number of jams caused by accidents will be no more in existence.
To recapitulate, undeniably, extensive roads are worthwhile to combat the concern of traffic. However, this is not the only solution, governments must take some other remedial measures to nip this issue in the bud.
- we are seeing a significant increase inonline shopping today What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend Give your own opinion and relevant examples 90
- Completing university education is thought by some to be the best way to get a good job On the other hand other people think that getting experience and developing soft skills is more important Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 84
- Governments give a lot of support to artists even though some people think it is a waste of money that could have been used elsewhere Discuss both views and give your opinion 80
- Nowadays more and more older people compete with younger people for the same jobs What can be the reason for this What would you suggest as a solution 73
- These days more emphasis is being placed on university education Vocational training is not encouraged and thus there are few qualified trades people To which extent do you agree or disagree 70
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
Need to put most content to argue 'Some people believe it is a good idea to construct wider roads to resolve this issue. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? ', while one paragraph is enough for 'What can be the solution, in your opinion?'
--------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 5.5 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 24 15
No. of Words: 371 350
No. of Characters: 1791 1500
No. of Different Words: 200 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.389 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.827 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.586 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 134 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 94 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 65 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.458 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.924 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.26 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.475 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.04 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...a to address this worrying issue. Here, i would like to discord with the given st...
^
Line 5, column 77, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
... my view. First and foremost, nowadays, most of people travel by their personal cars and it le...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 333, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...to control traffic. Last but not least, a large number of trees will be cut down due to construc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 380, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... number of trees will be cut down due to construction of wider roads. As a result...
^^
Line 9, column 121, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ustify, roads will not get flooded with a large number of vehicles if there is ample space to tra...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, while, as a result, on the contrary, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01347708895 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71582838251 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55525606469 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7527776436 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.5 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4583333333 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256625618997 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617403370127 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421592910248 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1395275104 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381232269813 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.