in photo
The chart provides information about the money spent on fast foods every week in Britain. The line graph also illustrates the mass of fast foods consumption from 1970 to 1990.
As for the high income group, they spend a great deal money on hamburgers slightly more than 40 pounds a week. The same applies to average income people who rather hamburgers above all else around 35 pence per week. By comparison low income group consume fish and chips the most about 18 pence in a week and hamburger is their second choice which they pay 14 pence for it in a week and pizza is third with cost of 8 pence per week. Pizza is the second popular kind of fast food among high income section which they spend 20 pence for it every week and approximately 18 pence for fish and chips. Average income people also eat fish and chips at the second place (25 pence) and pizza is last (12 pence).
In terms of consumption of fast foods, from 1970 to 1990, an upward trend can be seen for hamburgers and pizza and conversely a downward trend for fish and chips. With more details, the consumption of fish and chips had a minor drop from 1970 to 1985 and a slight increase at the time.
All in all, from these graphs, it can be included that hamburgers has been the most popular fast food now and then.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-11-25 | nargesdnp95 | 11 | view |
| 2017-11-15 | nargesdnp95 | 11 | view |
| 2017-11-13 | nargesdnp95 | 11 | view |
| 2017-11-12 | nargesdnp95 | 11 | view |
| 2014-05-03 | Navjot | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'foods'' or 'food's'?
Suggestion: foods'; food's
...graph also illustrates the mass of fast foods consumption from 1970 to 1990. As for ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, second, so, then, third, as for, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.37238493724 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17204386437 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510460251046 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7458384862 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.36 8.06136585366 79% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.