"The study of history has value only to the extent that it is relevant to our daily lives."
The significance of investigation of history to better comprehend the current affairs in today’s human life is not stealthy for anyone. Among a diversified constellation of perspectives, some may regard the part of the history which is pertained to daily activity should be only endorsed, in contrast, there exist other persevering on unravelling the notion that all phenomena, debacles and triumphs during all period of history in spite of being relevant or irrelevant to current today’s life must be considered. After weighing both dimensions, the latter idea seems more plausible.
To inaugurate, the latter opinion based on justifying all aspects of history can be scrutinized cogently. Going into the depth, having achieved an invaluable treasure of experiences derived from all events occurring through the history, the human may not deal with a myriad of challenges to unearth more coherent decision about all their affairs. To delineate, obtaining experiences from the past ancestors can propel the current generation toward a pinnacle of prosperities. Accordingly, the opportunity of extenuating the risks of actions will be lowered to their lowest point. As a result, the predominance of perusing what happened in the past to obviate the obstacles and barriers in all aspects of life subsuming both pertinent and impertinent performances in now humans’ lives can be fathomed totally.
Another angle elucidating the latter opinion is being useful and profitable for future activity not the current ones. Going into the depth, only when one becomes engross into the importance of the achievements of past eminent ones to ameliorate or alter their accomplishment in a future time, can it be anticipated that new channels of successes will be widened for that person. To shed more light on this issue, based on one scientific research conducted in a psychological province, the more the individuals come to the point that some previous experiences seeming redundant can be utilized in the future life, furthermore, they may contribute the humans to elevate their current position to higher levels and to resolve a plethora of problems of humans. Thus, who could deny the necessity of past history to better predict the events and issues in the future time?
What I mentioned above might not be overgeneralized to whole contexts. Simply stated, there are some cases which the past history such as traditional theory, law or even culture cannot conform to current daily activates, hence, it is critically substantial to revise or eradicate them to seize more appropriate repercussions. To clarify, rarely do all assorted cases can be categorized in this group. Conversely, it is all transparent that if the subsistence such those heterodox attitudes is eager to engender discrepancy or incongruity with today’s affairs, it will sound reasonable to extricate them to augment the circumstances of one‘s life. Therefore, what can demonstrate the critical point of past and gorgeous history to adapt it to current lives to extenuate the susceptibility of taking risks?
Drawing upon the enumerated reasons, despite existing some exceptions deviated from the general rule, the benefits of acquiring lessons from all periods of history to build up a safer life style are too enormous to fathom. To recapitulate the reasons, not only do the humans take giant steps toward auspicious life, but also they may be predisposed to a surge of precious accomplishments originated from the famous inventors and researchers persons to implement them for their future life.
(562 words)
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-10-16 | Shreyan36 | 66 | view |
2020-08-08 | jj2824d | 87 | view |
2019-12-01 | bstergios55@yahoo.com | 70 | view |
2017-11-16 | zenith222 | 92 | view |
2014-10-05 | zahravakili | 75 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter sent by a committee of homeowners from the DeerhavenAcres to all homeowners in Deerhaven Acres."Seven years ago, homeowners in nearby Brookville community adopted a set of restrictionson how the community's yards should 16
- Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning 16
- Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument."Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouragedstudents t 16
- buying the new technology immediately after they arrive versus waiting 85
- Such nonmainstream areas of inquiry as astrology, fortune-telling, and psychic andparanormal pursuits play a vital role in society by satisfying human needs that are notaddressed by mainstream science."Write a response in which you discuss the extent to w 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 288, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'unearthing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: unearthing
...ay not deal with a myriad of challenges to unearth more coherent decision about all their ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, conversely, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, therefore, thus, in contrast, such as, as a result, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 98.0 58.6224719101 167% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3040.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 563.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39964476021 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87110059796 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09770316291 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 303.0 215.323595506 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538188277087 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 983.7 704.065955056 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 100.696313239 60.3974514979 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.0 118.986275619 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6315789474 23.4991977007 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94736842105 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115759191141 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349999554037 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461163176961 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0757093940943 0.150359130593 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058834776787 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 14.1392134831 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 48.8420337079 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.52 8.38706741573 125% => OK
difficult_words: 194.0 100.480337079 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.