According to the given set of the reading passage, it is the author's conviction that based on the fossil relics from a specific dinosaur named Sinosauropterys, they cannot be supposed as feathered dinosaurs owing to several highlighted reasons. On the contrary, the lecturer casts doubt on this justification and repudiates each of the author's specific point by providing several counter-arguments points that are as follows:
First of all, the reading holds the view that the fine lines cannot declare the functional structures of the Sinosauropterys. However, the lecturer finds this reason unconvincing and asserts that fine lines observed in the fossils of other animals in the same site beautifully support this idea as well. With this in mind, it was found that functional skin structures of other animals have been preserved very well without any decomposition.
Secondly, although the author posits that the lines, enclosed the skeleton of the Sinosauropterys, are very similar to be fossilized relics of frills, the lecturer refutes this reason too by explaining that there is an important difference between the chemical components of frills and feathers. In other words, the feathers contain a huge amount of a particular protein which is absent in frills. As a result, the existence of this chemical indicates that the lines observed in the skeletons are remains of feathers.
As the last point to emphasize the reading claim, the author points out that since the main function of the feathers is to assist the animal to fly or regulate the temperature of the body, the remains lines have found in their tails and along the backbones. Yet again, the lecturer states on the opposite side and contradicts that sometimes, the feathers have another function. For instance, some birds display their colorful feathers in order to attract the mate. As a result, the orange and white colors, found on the structures of the Sinosauropterys, strongly support this idea that the Sinosauropterys might have used these feathers to display them.
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 80
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitiv 80
- Do you agree or disagree: Students are more interested in politics now than they were in the past. 83
- TPO-30 - Integrated Writing Task A little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a "burning mirror": a polished co 80
- Integrated 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...n set of the reading passage, it is the authors conviction that based on the fossil rel...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, as a result, first of all, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1373.03311258 126% => OK
No of words: 328.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26524390244 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98101362323 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521341463415 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.3327859761 49.2860985944 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.0 110.228320801 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8181818182 21.698381199 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9090909091 7.06452816374 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326487303876 0.272083759551 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116573836898 0.0996497079465 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054585495901 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183155797091 0.162205337803 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688701968319 0.0443174109184 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.3589403974 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.8541721854 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.88 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.