Air pollution and traffic congestion is becoming the major problem of mega cities throughout the world these days. So this issue has urged government to come up with effective resolutions. Someone claimed that dramatic drop in the price of petrol would contribute to fruitful results. In my opinion, there is no point in this idea, although there are other sorts of mean that would smooth the way for having less traffic jam and air pollutant.
Firstly, it is argued that rising in oil cost could strongly influence the acceleration of soaring quantity of automobile and cleaning the air. Nevertheless, increasing the petrol price solely would not solve the problem. Formerly, implementation of similar problem in some big cities illustrate that even raise in oil price even is not the right solution. Of course, maybe it could refrain people to use their private in short-term, but in case of long-term perspective the plain is thoroughly unsuccessful. For instance, Tehran is known as one of the top-ranking cities that every autumn and winter severely suffer from intensive air pollution. Even the plan of increasing of prices in several steps was not influential and people could adjust themselves finally to provision of petrol.
On the other hand, there are enormous number of way that would be more practical regarding reduction in traffic capacity and pollution. Limiting people to drive car every other day or prohibiting private car from commuting in some determined parts of the city that are overcrowded in some hours daily are other possible way that mentors are unanimous about their impacts. Besides, government ought to unify their efforts in order to inform people about its unforeseen health and social problems. For instance, a TV program is now broadcasting from channel four in Iran every day that ask people not use single passenger car except in urgent. Finally the last policy that would result in making people more obedience to use vehicles more environmentally-friendly is fine. They should be fined for all lawlessness associate with laws that are passed with regard to triggering traffic and air pollution.
To sum up, in my point of view, climbing in the petrol cost could not play a positive role in dropping automobile in street and air pollution reduction. However, they are several other vital procedures that would lead to better city to drive and breathing.
- Schools are spending more time teaching traditional subjects such as history. Some people think they should rather spend more time in teaching skills that can help students find a job.To what extent do you agree or disagree. 95
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 65
- The government should reduce the amount of money spent on local environmental problems and instead increase funding into urgent and more threatening issues such as global warming To what extent do you agree 59
- Many people believe that university students should pay tuition fees in full themselves, because they gain education for their own benefit and not for the society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 643, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
... single passenger car except in urgent. Finally the last policy that would result in ma...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, for instance, in short, of course, in my opinion, to sum up, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2012.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 391.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14578005115 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84097753964 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552429667519 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6414170867 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.777777778 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7222222222 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11919847464 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404866221973 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411530570174 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0717281510342 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0130852081889 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.