Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?
Traffic and pollution problems are upward trends in this day and age and are considered as serious issues. While some people agree on increasing the price of petrol as s resolution, I only partly agree with this statement.
On the one hand, raising the petrol price would partly address environmental problems. Firstly, this would help to cut down on emissions since there is a huge decrease in the number of private cars and motorcycles. This measure will also help to cut down on trips. Still, people need to go to work or school or they crave long journeys during vacation; therefore, they would need to pay more, maybe pay through the nose, for petrol to go. They, otherwise, have to change into short trips to compensate for the price of petrol. Secondly, raising prices will result in an increasing demand for public transport; hence, the government must upgrade and expand public transport provision.
On the other hand, national and local authorities could take many measures to stop these raising problems. First of all, the government could adopt policies to use public transport. Authorities should encourage people to use public transport which is much cheaper to avoid congestion as well as exhaust fumes from private cars. Secondly, some transport policies should be adopted as well. In London, for instance, there is a congestion charge, this charge therefore will be used to improve transport facilities. Furthermore, these policies would help decrease traffic jams, as well as decrease toxic emissions, and help to reduce air pollution.
In conclusion, while I partly agree the government could increase the petrol price to address increasing traffic and pollution problems, other measures can be adopted.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-13 | Marywonderlaw | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-24 | Atefeh 1248 | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-19 | Veejar89 | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-18 | HappyCandy | 84 | view |
| 2022-03-20 | Reven Fernando | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of passengers railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004 5 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the possible connection between the burning of fuels like oil and coal and the death of fish and trees Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 59
- Some cities create housing for growing populations by building taller buildings while other cities have opted to build on wider areas of land Which solution is better 78
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23021582734 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65814438799 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55035971223 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4722116442 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9333333333 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4666666667 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147188756874 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545093792492 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634567094834 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129646455649 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831885814894 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.