Some professionals consider that a top priority ought to be established for kids to start learning a second language at primary schools rather than secondary schools. And i also completely agree with the idea. This essay will discuss firstly the significant gains at secondary schools and secondly, why primary schools are extremely worthwhile for youths to commence learning non-native languages with relevant examples.
On the one hand, a remarkable reduction of heavy burdens is one of the major plus points in secondary schools. For illustration, if the exotic languages increased extra loads on children in secondary schools, apart from their family members, they could seek for social supports that are evidently effective in lessening additional strains. However, as regards primary schools, many youths are entirely limited to their parents who prove to be clearly inadequate for lifting onerous burdens of the youngsters. Next, there is only a slight chance that children in secondary schools will have problems with respect to vocabularies and terminologies of the overseas language. The children can effortlessly manage such contemporary phrasings compared to primary schools where youngsters are likely to mix up words from different dialects when they encounter substantial difficulties.
Nevertheless, i firmly consider that the advantages of the acquisition of foreign languages at primary schools readily prevail the discussed benefits of secondary schools because of the following reasons. Children invariably give an excellent try in spite of the consequences that may show either a positive or a negative result. Furthermore, if juveniles try out new words, they will be eager to receive a quick response from other peers according to the study. Conversely, children in secondary schools grow excessively frightened and shy upon learning a new language, which genuinely deters them to devote an extra effort. On the second place, children fancy learning an abroad language since they can be severely tempted in the learning via silly songs and nursery rhymes, whereas the given activities can become truly bizarre for secondary school students. So kids are found to pick up the unfamiliar language promptly while having fun. This ascertains why primary schools are far more better than primary schools as for learning an exotic language for kids.
In conclusion, with the consideration of profits like being incredibly comfortable and taking intense delight, presumably, they eclipse the mentioned leverages of secondary schools.
- Countries becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 70
- Sports today is turning into a business with many companies involved and ever growing prize money for the sportsmen Do you think it is positive or negative development 81
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment?Give reasons for your answer and in 56
- The bar chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The pie charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Oman and Spain in 2005 and projections for 2055 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 57
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
what are those 'burdens', 'social supports'? it is not clear:
a remarkable reduction of heavy burdens is one of the major plus points in secondary schools. For illustration, if the exotic languages increased extra loads on children in secondary schools, apart from their family members, they could seek for social supports that are evidently effective in lessening additional strains. However, as regards primary schools, many youths are entirely limited to their parents who prove to be clearly inadequate for lifting onerous burdens of the youngsters.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 387 350
No. of Characters: 2125 1500
No. of Different Words: 228 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.435 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.491 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.839 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 179 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 152 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 102 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 64 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.188 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.72 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.875 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.35 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.522 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.074 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 987, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
... ascertains why primary schools are far more better than primary schools as for learning an...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, apart from, as for, as regards, in conclusion, in spite of, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2175.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62015503876 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90875283096 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59173126615 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3687347088 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.9375 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1875 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373659594671 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119618035806 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112692997801 0.0667982634062 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212627826399 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131243072652 0.056905535591 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.