Generally speaking, an essential attribute in relationships is telling the truth. However, still there are few debates about that sometimes its urgent to keeping a relationship coherent by not telling the truth, and it has a few advantages. In my point of view, whether not telling the truth maybe has some advantages I do strongly recommend to shun it for following reasons.
One important aspect of telling the truth is that it makes trust. All mutual relationships are based on belief and chiefly, speaking the truth building trust in a period. According to my experiences when a tie corrupted with lies it eventually doomed to separation and stygian end. For example, once I was in college I had a friend in which she was a subtle lier, and It took a period until others know her. After a while not only she couldn't start new relationships but also all of her friends left her, and she became a recluse. However, I gave her this piece of advice that she needs to see a psychologist and after a while, her treatments worked and finally she changed the gloomy atmosphere around her.
Another equally important thing about telling the truth is that without it the society gets departed. Society cast's based on mutual trust and without trust in which is the result of telling the truth as mentioned before, everything takes apart. For example, imagine a society which formed based on lies. In kind of community, there is always fear with people because no one can trust others. By the same token, there is no briskness economy, no business, no communities, no social gatherings, politicians accuse each other and it leads to a chaos. Statistical reports show's in these types of societies the rate of separation accrue and sometimes all these problems lead to revolutions unless people start to tell the truth and stop being complacent and think about group benefits over self-interests.
So based on all above-mentioned points telling the truth is the first important criterion in starting new relationships or maintaining old ones and lack of it not only jeopardize private relations but also impinge's on society and the big p
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement.In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 88
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. 73
- Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects. What is specific to these online encyclopedias, 85
- Do you agree or disagree technology has made children life less creative than in the past. support your answer with reasons and examples. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommend shunning'.
Suggestion: recommend shunning
...maybe has some advantages I do strongly recommend to shun it for following reasons. One import...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 436, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...rs know her. After a while not only she couldnt start new relationships but also all of...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, may, so, still, while, for example, kind of, by the same token, to tell the truth
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1776.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91966759003 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81681903967 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559556786704 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6554036771 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5625 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148715214036 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576103534016 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457623534447 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992238642976 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397272487782 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.