The line graph shows the past and projected finances for a local authority in New Zealand.
The given line graph compares the information about the past and anticipated finances for a local authority in New Zealand over a decade from 2012 to 2022.
Overall, it can be seen that Rates revenue and Use charges are estimated to climb throughout the term in the question. Borrowings and Grants and subsidies will almost remain stable.
As regards, Rates revenue, it stood at nearly 1400 million in 2012 and went unaltered until the beginning of 2013, whereas User charges swelled to 1300 million from 1000 million, which meant that it went up three times the original value. After that they both saw a steady upward trend and will have ballooned to 2400 million and 2000 million respectively by 2022.
However, with respect to Borrowings, despite rising initially from approximately 800 million to around 1200 from 2012 to mid 2014, there was a sharp fall, plummeting to 600 million in 2016. Next, it witnessed a rapid growth in the following year and subsequently is predicted to hit a peak at about 1400 million in 2020, making it the highest figure for the mentioned span. After that, the trend is projected to slid rapidly to finish nearly at the same level (800) that it started. Grants and subsidies recorded the lowest value at 400 million, compared to the rest in 2012. Even though there was a swift jump from 2015 to 2016 to 700 million, the amount will then drop gradually to just under 500 million in the end of 2022.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-19 | Madhu081191aluri | 56 | view |
| 2018-07-03 | m.adelcma | 42 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | kaka singh | 86 | view |
| 2018-10-28 | reza_fattahi | 72 | view |
- The line graph shows the sales of children books adult s fictions and educational books between 2002 and2006 in one country 84
- Some people believe that exploring outer space is important because it expands human knowledge and might lead to discoveries that will benefit humanity in the future. Other people believe that space exploration is a waste of money that could be better spe 96
- The money given to help poor countries does not solve the problem of poverty, so rich countries should give other types of help instead.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 90
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 75
- The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales in various formats of film from a particular store between 2002 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 83
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 8.0 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 250 200
No. of Characters: 1154 1000
No. of Different Words: 148 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.976 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.616 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.374 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 74 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 55 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 29 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 23 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.786 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.3 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.387 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.637 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.044 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and 2000 million respectively by 2022. However, with respect to Borrowings, des...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 726, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t under 500 million in the end of 2022.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, well, whereas, as regards, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1190.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42920892473 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 106.607317073 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3959512511 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11764511905 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545047907882 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138186546455 0.0843802449381 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123334805232 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.198370271064 0.0819641961636 242% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.