The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
The pie chart depicts the dominant causes for migration to and from the UK in 2007.
Overall, it can be seen that landing a definite job was the primary reason why people left the UK and non native folks moved to the UK.
Approximately a third (30%) of people established a top priority to exotic countries when it came for a specific job, whereas the figure for emigration was almost close to immigration at 29%. Interestingly, it (job) constituted the highest total of all other five purposes. Next, while looking for work resulted to 12% of people leaving the UK, there was as twice as many people (24%) entering the UK. About a quarter (26%) of people chose foreign nations for formal study, which was considerably higher than emigration at 4%.
Even though 'no reason stated', was the least net (6%) as regards immigration, emigration was three folds greater than immigration at 18%. Turning to 'other' the difference in the proportion was a little at 11% (immigration) and 14% (emigration). Likewise, 'accompany' began at 15% ( immigration) and 13% (emigration) respectively.
- In cities and towns all over the world the high volume of traffic is a problem. What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem? 96
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business district.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 75
- Some people decide to start their own business instead of working for a company or organization.Do the advantages for people working for their own business outweigh the disadvantages?Give reason for your answer and include any relevant examples from your 61
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cellphone tracking and security cameras.) In many cases, the people being monitored are unware that this is happening.Do you think the advanta 76
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 180 200
No. of Characters: 844 1000
No. of Different Words: 113 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.663 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.689 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.874 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 60 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 43 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 29 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 21 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.683 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.444 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.396 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.675 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.087 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 209, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'jobs'?
Suggestion: jobs
...o immigration at 29%. Interestingly, it job constituted the highest total of all ot...
^^^
Line 7, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ration. Likewise, accompany began at 15% immigration and 13% emigration respectiv...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, look, so, third, whereas, while, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92222222222 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87155053397 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7598636707 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4444444444 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156457894133 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741049242219 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778704445295 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126550804272 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919548270486 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.