Some people believe that the range of technology available to individuals today is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people, while others say that technology has the opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
For the last decades, the use of technology has soared in astounding ways. Even though some people claim that the automation has bridged the voids between wealthy people and underprivileged people, in my opinion, indeed, mechanisation has widened the intervals. This essay will first discuss the reasons about how the technology has aided to equal the disparities and secondly, the relevant rationales that have played a significant role in expanding the inconsistencies between the rich and poor masses.
On the one hand, generally speaking, smart phones, which have skyrocketed enormously nowaday...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-09 | atefeh asadi | 73 | view |
| 2018-06-05 | Dthphuong | 89 | view |
| 2017-10-10 | milanree1527@yahoo.com | 78 | view |
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 63
- The bar chart below shows figures of annual coffee and meat consumption. 73
- Countries becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 70
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in1999. 61
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 70
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 8.5 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 340 350
No. of Characters: 1814 1500
No. of Different Words: 228 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.294 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.335 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.9 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 143 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 111 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 76 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 53 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 28.333 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 13.468 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.317 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.563 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.027 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1864.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48235294118 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99806165754 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673529411765 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.4411032708 49.4020404114 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.333333333 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210046205393 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623396729824 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512970116786 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10835064128 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850883644737 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.