Some people believe that the range of technology available to individuals today is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people, while others say that technology has the opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In recent decades, the invention of technology sector has been receiving a great deal of social attention due to its substantial impacts on human 's life. Some people believe that the range of technology is blamed for worsening the inequality gap between countries while others argue that recent advances in this field bring considerable benefits for poorer society. Before drawing a reasoned conclusion, let us analyze both sides of this argument.
To begin with, thanks to technology's forward, the social networking associated with acessing information has been exploded across the globe. It's vulnerable that the children in poor contries are able to involve in high-standard tertiary education through the wideless broadband Internet instead only the rich could study in the past. No one could deny that technology plays an essential part not only in human's civilization but also in advancement of science, which is considered to be a motivation for globalisation, in terms of integration and development. This phenomenon as an opportunity for developing countries to accquire advanced knowledge and receive technical assistance from the rich countries in an attempt to boost both the economy and society. Therefore it is clear that the range of technology is more likely to inspire some benefits among the poorer nations.
These immerse popularity of technology 's site is evidence that they contribute to user's lives in possitive ways, but they are drawbacks as well. These inventions are tended to pose the inequality gap between countries. Such people in rich states, those who have a chance to approach a huge amount of advamced devices, is likely to navigate a technology enviroment imparts advantages that tranfer far beyond development. By constract, poor nations seem to have economic obstacle that prevent them from advancing in science sector as well as approaching high-tech equipments. The poorer they are, the less quality of life they improve, which result in worsening the inequality gap.
To conclude, I am firmly convinced that the range of technology has many advantages outweight disadvantages due to its great benefits for poor people. Therefore, I believe that technology yield to equality for both upper and lower class society without causing wealth gap.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-09 | atefeh asadi | 73 | view |
| 2018-06-05 | Dthphuong | 89 | view |
| 2017-10-10 | milanree1527@yahoo.com | 78 | view |
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy same products anywhere in the world.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 80
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning for a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweight the disadvantages? 56
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give yo 84
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
- Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature of their own country than other countries. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 760, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... to boost both the economy and society. Therefore it is clear that the range of technolog...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, well, while, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1925.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37709497207 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93053504361 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59217877095 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2536554693 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.333333333 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8666666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53333333333 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243145747663 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748732371446 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579426238643 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15049542438 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390292839713 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.