Integrated writing of TPO 26
In the lecture, the professor points out that the hypothesis made by the reading passage is not adequate to explain that freshwater shellfish native of Eastern Europe spreading to North America be a serious threat to freshwater fish populations in all North America. He points several weaknesses of the statement made by the reading passage.
On one hand, the professor claims that spreading mussels by the ship travel across Europe to North America can be controlled by the people who get the knowledge of this. In fact, he argues that the ship that takes on freshwater in Europe and empties that into America, can substitute the salt water with freshwater to empty and salt water would kill the mussels.
What's more, the professor doubts the hypothesis that by increasing the population of mussels in new habitat will dominate them due to lack of predator. He states that this is the beginning of their new life in the new habitat and soon and late, some aquatic birds will choose these fishes as a new food source for themselves and it causes the decline of the mussel’s population.
Finally, the lecturer reason is cast doubt on the reading statement based on that eliminating the mussels as the planktons predators can increase the population of other fish species which compete with mussels for food. In fact, the professor claims that although mussels have a negative impact on fishes eat the plankton, they have the positive impact on other fishes in the bottom of the lake or river that mussels generate nutrients which are eaten by those fishes.
Therefore, the professor points out some reasons that are contrary to the statements made by reading passage.
- Integrated writing TPO40 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Integrated TPO 22 80
- Integrated writing – TPO24 68
- The advertisement role of people for eating junk foods 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...and salt water would kill the mussels. Whats more, the professor doubts the hypothes...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, therefore, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97153024911 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56505879109 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505338078292 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.9 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.8787501697 49.2860985944 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.222222222 110.228320801 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2222222222 21.698381199 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 7.06452816374 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390237971312 0.272083759551 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149480214769 0.0996497079465 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786788566505 0.0662205650399 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184591474143 0.162205337803 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811100996988 0.0443174109184 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.3589403974 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 53.8541721854 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.