Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss pros and cons impacts.
The importance of mass communication, which has always been debatable, has now become more controversial. With many people claiming that it is beneficial, others reject this nation. The substantial influence of technology on communication has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend in recent years. In my opinion, the former propositions appear to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative effects of the rapid development of communication and thus will reach a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that technology boosts the speed of communication and increase the accessibility. According to startling new research, for example, face-to-face communication change into our kith and kin.
There are some pitfalls, however, that negates this argument and which can be certainly overwhelmed the potential influence of technology. But the most alarming one is rooted in the fact that invasion of privacy occurred.
Approaches to deal with these concerns which are numerous but the most effective one completely knows about the mass media detrimental effects, which is impracticable and unattainable, but comprehensive and feasible. As an illustration, research in this area invariably reveals that the more knowledge you gain the less identity theft happened.
In a nutshell, one can reach a conclusion that in most cases rapidly progress of mass communication would be beneficial. So prominent is the impact that misusing it, which a number of drawbacks should be well handled.
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not. 85
- Parents are responsible for the behaviour of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 85
- People attend colleges or universities for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge etc.) 84
- can change human behaviour. Do you agree or not? 89
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss pros and cons impacts. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, thus, well, for example, in most cases, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59362549801 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19650548864 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605577689243 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4306902095 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.066870049457 0.242375264174 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0234134362937 0.0925447433944 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336888214154 0.071462118173 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0355475789595 0.151781067708 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336292731543 0.0609392437508 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.