People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The claim of the author implies that allowing emotion to overcome a judgement can lead to poor decisions. It seems to be valid at an inchoate level, bolstered by the fact that thinking is better justified by brain than by heart or emotions. People who allow emotions to inundate their decisions often have to regret later on.
Decision making is a very complex and convoluted process, involving astronomical amounts of permutations and combinations, leading to infinitely many possible consequences. A person must consider all the potential ramifications that could result due to implementation of a decision, irrespective of the number of factors involved. Such recondite procedure can only be successfully attempted if the thinking is done logically rather emotionally.
Emotions are indispensable and irrevocable parts of a human being and it would not be refutable to assume that in almost every decision that a human being makes, there is a certain level of involvement of emotions. Nevertheless, a person must keep his equanimity and composure while making his decisions. Most of the decisions resulting due to emotional outburst turn out to be haphazard and affect detrimentally, sooner or later. For example, the decision taken in extreme anger, to sue your new neighbor who accidentally or innocuously mowed your lawn, might turn out not only losing a potential friendship but also beginning an unwanted rivalry.
However, it is also an impeccable fact that a person who follows his gut is more likely to become successful. Many of the world's prominent and prodigal entrepreneurs would admit that they made their decisions emotionally while the others logically condemned them. On the other hand, a good habit of logical decision making could make your life more easier and prosperous; although to judge whether a decision is beneficial or deleterious should be irrespective of the result of that decision.
Thus, it would be sagacious to assume that a person must make his decisions logically but with a little courage and confidence upon his emotions.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Distance learning and online computer classes should replace classroom learning Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 83
- Claim: An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action.Reason: When assessing the morality of an action, the results of the action are more important than the i 66
- Concern about the phenomenon known as global warming has been growing in recent years. Earths temperature is rising, largely as a result of human activity. Since the Industrial Revolution, humans have added significantly to the greenhouse gases in the Ear 80
- The following opinion was provided in a letter to the editor of a national aeronautics magazine:“Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great 57
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 49
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 345, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...al decision making could make your life more easier and prosperous; although to judge wheth...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 329.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31914893617 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07901985435 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577507598784 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.554463927 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219705440981 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745702019337 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531488753786 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12606612398 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358279389367 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.