Children’s education is expensive. In some countries, the government pays some or all the costs. Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages?
It is true that some nation authorities fund the education of children partially or in full since it takes a great deal of money. While this trend brings about drawbacks, I would argue that these are outweighed by the benefits.
On the one hand, there are some negative consequences when authorities finance some or all the costs to educate children. The biggest drawback is that governments might run out of money to invest in other development concerns. In fact, rulers are faced with practical decisions on how to allocate their national finite budgets, and paying children’s education would mean less money to spend on pressing issues such as health care or the environment. Another disadvantageous impact is that some schoolchildren may take the government funding for granted and thus, lose motivation to study industriously. If pupils do not acknowledge how privileged they are when being able to enjoy such funded education, they might lose the incentive to get good grades at school or to attain their goals in life. In this regard, financial support from the government could be considered as a waste of money.
On the other hand, I believe that it is more beneficial for government authorities to finance children’s education partially or fully. Individually, with such funding, pupils from poorer sections with low incomes and no savings, those who can barely afford to go to school, will have the opportunity to be educated formally. As a result, they can later apply for well-paid careers such as engineers, doctors, and lawyers and enjoy a better standard of living. In terms of society as a whole, if children from low-income backgrounds have the chance to develop their talents thanks to the government’s financial support, social inequalities will definitely be alleviated and a highly civilized society will no longer be a utopian dream.
In conclusion, despite some negative impacts, it seems to me that the merits of government funding on children’s education have more than compensated for its disadvantages.
- Living in big cities is bad for people's health. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 84
- Children’s education is expensive. In some countries, the government pays some or all the costs. Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages? 84
- Many young people change their jobs and careers What are the reasons for this Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 69
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26139817629 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.123280377 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589665653495 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.5043813331 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.153846154 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272981650797 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968994438576 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809390379873 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170020099398 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557811902306 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.