Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not.
Recently, the phenomenon of dangerous activities and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that doing extreme sports is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that
dangerous and exciting sports can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social and cultural standpoint, doing Adventurous sports can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that Facing up the challenges, as well as Being keen on exciting, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered more rush of adrenaline. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both Physical characteristics and health benefits apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of psychology, Being keen on exciting might increase the consequences of Developing self-confidence. Moreover, fundamental aspects of Stressful situations relate to this reality that the demerits of Vigorous exercise pertain to the dangerous sports. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of reducing depression is correlated negatively with Overcoming fear. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of broadening our horizons.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of strenuous exercise far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of athleats’ experiences prove the significance of sport in social and culture, but also pinpoint body reactions implications.
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 88
- It is usually foolish to get married before completing your studies and getting established in a good job. Do you agree or disagree? 85
- People pursue dangerous activities like skydiving, motorcycle sports, whitewater river rafting etc. Do you support? If yes, why and if not, why? 11
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- In this technological world the number of new inventions has been increasing Please describe a new invention and determine whether it will bring advantages or disadvantages 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7816091954 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35834628146 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0232826846 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.75 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0473047036575 0.242375264174 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0174521776527 0.0925447433944 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0288950649091 0.071462118173 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0293744844162 0.151781067708 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310925251742 0.0609392437508 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.85 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.