The table below shows personal savings as a percentage of personal income for selected countries in 1970, 1990 and 2000.
The table presents the percentage of savings in personal income of seven countries in 1970, 1990 and 2000.
Overall, only the UK had the rate of personal savings increasing from 1970 to 2000 and this rate decreased in others countries at the same period.
In 1970, Italy was the country that led in the proportion of savings with 29.5%, followed by France and Japan with 18.7% and 17.6% respectively whereas Canada had the lowest saving rate with 5.6%. In 1990, Italy witnessed a decrease to 17.6% but it was still the leading nation. On the other hand, at the same time, the saving rate of Canada doubled to 11.5% and Germany still remained constant at 13.8%.
In 2000, France and Japan are the two nations that had the highest proportion of personal savings with 13.6% and the second level is 11.8% in Germany. USA continued to decline to 4%. Canada experienced a dramatic drop to 1.9% and became the country having the lowest saving rate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | RAYHAN MAHMUD | 67 | view |
- The bar chart below show a survey of a group of young professionals aged 20 30 who were asked to state which factors motivated them to succeed 84
- The table below shows personal savings as a percentage of personal income for selected countries in 1970 1990 and 2000 83
- The charts below show part of the results of an extensive public survey on people s attitude to a range of issues 75
- The table below shows the results of an airline survey in 2002 of economy class business travellers The numbers indicate how many male of female passengers in each age group rated a particular feature as their most important in flight consideration 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, so, still, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 788.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77575757576 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30050898668 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557575757576 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7518381992 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308081159049 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154444844686 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.187312113616 0.0843802449381 222% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271968782389 0.15604864568 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.206040902072 0.0819641961636 251% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.