The users of social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, are replacing face-to-face contact in this century. Do you think the advantages of this way outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, the advent of social media (Facebook, Twitter and so on) become a substitute for contacting face to face. In my opinion, negative effects of using social network are greater than benefits.
First of all, users' emotion cannot be easily perceived via social network to compare with keeping contact face to face. In the detail, stickers of social media and words typing cannot deliver accurately individuals' feeling. The situation can be seen in some argument events were happened inasmuch as delivering the message online caused misunderstanding. As a result, some relationships broken because of contacting with social media.
Another point to support my opinion is that meeting face to face can bring immensely chance of successful businesses and vital conversation. To specify, individuals can show pleasant and professional behavior through chatting face to face. Therefore, other side are easily approve of their conversation with the individual, when they meet with each other.
However, some users insist using social network can expand the available time and place. For example, because of Facebook and Line application, overseas students and abroad workers can chat with their family members regardless of geographical barriers. Furthermore, users can check their foreign friends' new posts and leave messages immediately. Thus, there are those saying that social networking was prevalence.
To conclude, using communication applications can delivering message anytime; nevertheless, chatting face to face understand each other's emotion at the moment and make successful conversation. As for me, I assume face to face is the most efficient way to stay in constant touch with people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays, the advent of social media Fac...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al network are greater than benefits. First of all, users emotion cannot be ea...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cause of contacting with social media. Another point to support my opinion is t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'approved'.
Suggestion: approved
... face. Therefore, other side are easily approve of their conversation with the individu...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...idual, when they meet with each other. However, some users insist using social...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that social networking was prevalence. To conclude, using communication applica...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 131, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
..., chatting face to face understand each others emotion at the moment and make successf...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, as for, for example, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65758754864 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94057893903 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622568093385 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3107137374 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9333333333 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246596240229 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918818622352 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819885688436 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153333737747 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599328839778 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.25 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.