While some folks believe that it is effective to work for the same company, others think that it is more rewarding to work for different organisations. This essay will discuss both sides and reach a relevant conclusion with relevant examples.
On the one hand, one of the leading benefits of sticking to one company is a leadership opportunity. For illustration, if people work in an institution for a long haul, they will readily attain seniority owing to the implicit trust placed on them by employers. Also, these workers are widely believed to remain unfailingly loyal to their boss. Seemingly,...
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 ad 2010 about one university.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Art is considered an important part of a society as well as an expression of its culture. Do you think it is important for children to be taught art? Do you think children should be encouraged to focus on art rather than other subjects? 70
- The graph shows Internet Usage in Taiwan by Age Group 1998 2000 80
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged. Others believe that children who are taught to co-operate rather than compete become more useful adults. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 96
- Countries becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 90
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 8.0 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 282 350
No. of Characters: 1487 1500
No. of Different Words: 185 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.098 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.273 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.879 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 108 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 89 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 63 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 46 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.143 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.938 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.571 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.291 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.511 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.028 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...wth in terms of creativity, personally, i believe that working for unrelated orga...
^
Line 7, column 183, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[1]
Message: The adjective superior is normally used with 'to'.
Suggestion: to
...lated organisations proves far superior than adhering to the same organisation.
^^^^
Line 7, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...than adhering to the same organisation.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, while, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42553191489 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98259626649 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648936170213 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3922097965 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.285714286 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371756901675 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10922721955 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112537960256 0.0667982634062 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225891696228 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0889445440089 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.