Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
Humans are the species which are known for their ability to think differently than any other species and to adapt to the changes. There are many instances where women have proven the claim that men and woman are equally suited for some tasks because of their inherent physical differences.
To start with, it was a belief that ladies are well suited for the jobs which require less physical efforts. Such as, ladies were usually made to take the education in medical and not in engineering because engineering job is considered to be requiring much physical work. But the scenario nowadays has not remain the same. One can find many number of female engineers and are much successful than men are in many cases.Even in the dental, girls were not considered good due to the strength required to pull out teeths in some conditions but increasing ladies dentist is the proof that adaption to the work and with some hardwork even the physical differences cannot make any difference.
Secondly, the body building profession which was considered to be male dominated as much of weight lifting is required. In todays date, there are many examples of female body builders who lifts 100's of pounds of weight. Weight lifting competition in olympics, asian games etc are proofs one would need to prove that hardwork and adaption is the key to achieve and overcome any limitations and physical differences.
However, one can challenge the stand taken by arguing that if it is so, that ladies can can do anything despite of their physical differences. Then why are not there equal number of ladies in each field as male. The reason for this is, history is the proof that ladies are always considred inferior to males. They were always given tasks of only managing the family, cooking food and taking care of childern. If you are not going to give same chance to prove themselves as men are given then these differnces are going to stay.Examples like Jhansi ki Rani, Mary Kom, Angelina Jolie are the proofs which shows that efforts and a chance can prove the stereotypical thinking wrong.
Concluding, the claim that physical differences makes ladies less suited of some jobs is inappropriate. And to counter this one can find numerous examples to prove it wrong in the present day and in the history also.
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 75
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 50
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment 50
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with 77
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...work. But the scenario nowadays has not remain the same. One can find many number of f...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'many numbers'.
Suggestion: many numbers
...s has not remain the same. One can find many number of female engineers and are much succes...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Even
...h successful than men are in many cases.Even in the dental, girls were not considere...
^^^^
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'ladies'' or 'lady's'?
Suggestion: ladies'; lady's
...eeths in some conditions but increasing ladies dentist is the proof that adaption to t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 689, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...differences cannot make any difference. Secondly, the body building profession w...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: can
...y arguing that if it is so, that ladies can can do anything despite of their physical d...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 528, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Examples
...then these differnces are going to stay.Examples like Jhansi ki Rani, Mary Kom, Angelina...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 168, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'wrongs'?
Suggestion: wrongs
... can find numerous examples to prove it wrong in the present day and in the history a...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 212, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...g in the present day and in the history also.
^^^^
Line 9, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he present day and in the history also.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, such as, in many cases, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1913.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 392.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88010204082 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5197561228 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515306122449 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.0069641135 60.3974514979 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5625 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275869408727 0.243740707755 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870503556901 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135755458928 0.0758088955206 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163825431324 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149377795018 0.0667264976115 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.