Many companies sell products or services but at the same time cause environmental damage. Someone said it can be stop by ask them to pay penalty, such as a higher tax when they cause the environmental damage. Others said there are better ways to stop them from harming environment. What do you think is the best way to prevent the environment from deteriorating?
Embracing with various and abandon products in today’s market, we human beings are truly beneficial from the industrial revolution. Manufactures and factories offer costumers high-quality goods at a relatively low price. However, some companies make progress in the cost of environmental damage, which is an absolutely stupid method to develop. According to my perspective, this kind of environment-damaging companies can make changes under some penalty in order to protect the environment.
First and foremost, companies and entrepreneurs will do their best to avoid cost like the environmental penalty. As we all know, the profit is the first for any company. If they have to pay a lot of penalties because they damage the environment, they will transform to environmentally friendly or just stop the pollution projects as soon as possible. Many companies, which have transformed successfully, even start programs to protect the environment for the right to avoid high taxes. Companies are not charities but they are willing to do those things to expand their interests. Thus, adjusting taxes to protect the environment will definitely be effective and efficient.
In addition, the government can make full use of the penalty from some companies to protect the environment. Tax is the major income for the government. By regulating the tax rate, the government will have more budget to protect the environment. In that case, the government will do more things, such as funding new research for renewable sources, building clean-energy factories, and eliminating pollutants. Thus, the government will help the companies to balance between economic development and environmental preservation.
Furthermore, it is not a wise idea to stop these companies or factories. All the factories existing today lead people to a better life and provide customers more varied goods. Closing some companies is an intervention to the market which may cause the price of substitute goods raise. It will damage the interests of both companies’ owners and common people. Also, thousands of workers will lose jobs if the government force a company close when it damages the environment. Unemployment is never welcomed by the government and individuals ether. That is to say, although stopping companies that damage the environment badly can achieve its goal in a short time, numerous social problems will bring up, too.
In conclusion, the best way to regulate companies and then protect the environment is to raise taxes in the situation that companies damage the nature severely. Companies will not bankrupt if they make the right decision, and may develop better afterwards.
- some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate Discuss both views and give you own opinion 78
- The diagram shows the process of recycling car batteries 73
- TPO 42 81
- the pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 70
- Giving aid to poorer countries has more negative effects than the positive effects To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, thus, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.0752688172 322% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2268.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46506024096 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18475465541 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546987951807 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 706.5 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3905015553 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2916666667 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.20833333333 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221536298368 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615764828506 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399242048317 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124389624888 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174719454247 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.